Cultural boycott is controversial, sensitive and difficult, there is no doubt about that. So when a member of the public – a drama teacher who was intending to take a group of students to one of this month’s performances in the UK by Israel’s Batsheva dance ensemble – wrote to campaigners pleading that protesters should “stay away from this dance performance” and “not scare and scream in the faces of these young people”, we were at pains to give a full and respectful answer.

Naomi Wimborne-Idrissi replied as follows:

Thank you for contacting us regarding your concerns about planned protests focusing on Israel’s Batsheva Ensemble.

I am responding as the Boycott Israel Network’s cultural working group coordinator and national secretary of Jews for Boycotting Israeli Goods, as well as someone who loves and regularly attends dance performances.

I do not know what your sources are for your reading about our campaign, but we are not, as you suggest, people “who could not care less about dance”. On the contrary, we care very much about dance being used cynically to cast a veil over the actions of a government which is anything but artistic in its discriminatory violence against Palestinians. Israel runs a well-funded campaign called Brand Israel which is specifically designed to exploit culture as a distraction from its crimes. The intended message is “Look at our beautiful dancers, ignore our bombs and tanks.”

It’s good to know that you agree with the “basic human right of being able to protest and voice an opinion.” I applaud the fact that you have looked into the appalling situation of the Palestinian people and that you appreciate that they are victims of many atrocities. In that case you must surely know that Palestinian artists and performers suffer from these atrocities at least as much as other members of their community.

Their ability to express themselves through art and culture is severely curtailed – indeed it is deliberately suppressed by the Israeli authorities who use every measure from administrative regulation to extreme violence to prevent Palestinian self-expression. I attach some references pertaining to this (*).

You may also wish to look at the website of the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel (PACBI) which explains their call for people of conscience around the world to mount solidarity campaigns such as ours.

Let me assure you we have no wish to deprive GCSE students of the chance to “see a piece of excellent dance so that they can write about it for their GCSE exam”. There are, fortunately for us, untold opportunities in the UK for dance-lovers to have such experiences. This is not the case for Palestinian young people, although Israeli youngsters do not lack for such opportunities.

If you are worried about the trauma your students might suffer by being exposed to someone unfurling a banner or calling out a slogan at a Batsheva performance, may I suggest you give them access to the ample materials explaining why the people of Palestine have called for such actions – not least the daily trauma experienced by Palestinian children such as the students of Hebron attacked by stone-throwing fundamentalist Jewish settlers acting under the protection of Israeli troops, or the children of Bedouin families in the Negev whose homes are constantly being demolished, or the children of Gaza, under siege since 2006 and at the mercy of Israeli bombing raids.

You ask why we do not protest at a Russian ballet performance. I might ask you the same question, but to respond seriously – if an oppressed people comparable with the Palestinians, with no other non-violent means of drawing attention to 60 years of dispossession and injustice, were calling on us to adopt this form of protest on their behalf against cultural institutions linked to the Russian state, we would have no hesitation in doing so. Maybe you are not aware that supporters of Israel adopted just such tactics against the Bolshoi Ballet and other Soviet cultural institutions as part of their campaign to persuade Moscow to let dissident Jews emigrate to Israel in the 1970s and ’80s.

We are thoroughly well acquainted with the personal views of Ohad Naharin, the artistic director of Batsheva, but these do not prevent the most right-wing government Israel has ever had embracing Batsheva as “our best global ambassador”. You can see an analysis of Batsheva’s position here.

If you wish to explore these issues further, and give your students an unprecedented opportunity to consider the many complex ways in which art and politics interact, I would be happy to introduce you to well-informed human rights campaigners in your area who they could meet for a discussion.

(*) Palestine, culture and politics – questions for students of the performing arts to consider (Suggestions from Miranda Pennell)

1) Can ethics be separated from aesthetics?

Consider the early European modern dance of Kurt Joss (The Green Table) and Mary Wigman, or the post-modern works of Yvonne Rainer (Trio A: The Mind is Muscle) to the ‘politics of perception’ attributed to Merce Cunningham by dance scholar Roger Copeland.

2. Examine the two essays on Palestine in:

Dance, Human Rights, and Social Justice: Dignity in Motion [Paperback]

Naomi Jackson (Editor), Toni Shapiro-Phim (Series Editor)

The first essay, ‘Roadblock’ by Maysoun Rafeedi, is short, direct and perhaps suitable for evoking for a young person the context of dance in Palestine from the perspective of a young dance teacher.

3. Explore Israel’s appropriation of Palestinian ‘Dabke’ folk dance in the 1940s and 50s as a Jewish Israeli dance, ‘Debke’. It has now been reclaimed with a popular resurgence of Dabke in Palestine, transforming a simple wedding dance into a form of cultural resistance in the face of decades of dispossession.

4. Read and discuss:

Raising Dust: A Cultural History of Dance in Palestine, by Nicholas Rowe


I am a Head of Drama … planning a school trip to see the Batsheva dance company. Whilst I completely agree with the basic human right of being able to protest and voice an opinion, I believe your protests are so far removed from what is acceptable for this performance.
I am taking 30 young students (between 13 and 16) to see what is going to be an outstanding piece of dance and from what I have read, we should be preparing ourselves for a night of constant interuption from members of the audience who could not care less about dance.
You may call us ignorant for not fully understanding the situation. However, I am fully aware that the Dance company has received money from the Israeli government and, having visited and done extensive research on the atrocities on the Palestinians, I believe I am in a situation where I can safely say that what you are about to stage at Brighton is
These students I am taking are young, impressionable people who want to see a piece of excellent dance so that they can write about it for their GCSE exam. Who are you to deprive them of this? By scaring them with your banners and loud shouts, you are not only jeopardising their experience, but you are using the wrong platform to express your opinion.
This is DANCE- a piece of excellently choreographed physical theatre from dancers from all around the world. Why not protest at Miriinski’s ballet? Surely you have heard of Putin’s human right abuse in Russia?!
The director of Batsheva (if you had bothered to read anything at all about the Dance piece) isn’t even in agreement with his Israeli government.
 To conclude, I urge you to please stay away from this dance performance. To let us watch and enjoy the show so that the students can write about it afterwards. To not scare and scream in the faces of these young people, who will not support you, but will be quite frightened of the commotion.


  1. Any chance of publishing the letter being replied to here or would that be a breach of the teacher’s privacy?

  2. since we probably agree about the much needed solution for the palestinians, about the wrong doing of the israeli army and government in the way they treat the palestinians, we probably also agree about the topic of boycott… i guess what left is the topic of boycotting batsheva… i recently wrote this sentence: “…the discussion about the right to call for a boycott of an artistic organization is a legitimate one… it should only take place when the art organization itself take part, collaborating in promoting the situation that is being protested against….”. which you might think is what batsheva dose… we can argue about that or about if is it ok to protest against our shows inside the theater… not so exiting…
    i am interested in facts, especially the learning of new ones… i have learn more and more to less care about being right,instead i try to be more right about being informed.. i also realize that there are grey areas. it becomes grey when i know something i can not prove and therefore i don’t need to convince (i cant) yet i know… (there is life elsewhere then our planet; for example).
    it is sad that so many times having the wrong facts manufactures so much suffering, injustice, innocent victims and what even more sad is when people distort facts on purpose to serve their agenda. for example; the constant use of “brand israel” while there is not such a thing any more… (there was, and even then i was not part of it) i constantly strive to narrow the gap between what i think reality is and what reality really is. i think i am slowly succeeding…it is a life long task. i find it very challenging and many times impossible to talk to people which have a big to huge gap between what they think reality is and what it really is.

    ohad naharin

  3. ““brand israel”……there is not such a thing any more”

    Are you sure it hasn’t simply been rebranded?

    • Ohad,
      How difficult is for an artist (you) to use the modicum of fame that a society bestows on him to take a stand on the defining moral question of that society, to say, not just off the record, but on stage, that one stands with the oppressed and for their liberation?

      Let me answer. It is very difficult. So what. You should do it. It is much easier than dying in an ambulance waiting in a checkpoint. As someone funded by the state of Israel with the monies of theft, that is the minimum you should do. As long as you can’t do that, don’t bother complaining about other people not taking the time to get to the bottom of your relation with the state–a “confusion” that only you can dispel by simply making that relation clear, on stage.

      By the way. 20% of Israeli citizens are Palestinians. What is the percentage of Palestinians in the Batsheva dance company?

  4. Are you sure Brand Israel hasn’t simply been rebranded?

    That’s a good question. Having launched the PR effort under the Brand Israel monicker back in 2005, there is no sign of the charm offensive slackening even though they may be keeping quiet about the name these days. There was a piece in the Jewish Chronicle just recently in which ambassador Daniel Taub explained at length how much of his time was devoted to sanitising Israel’s image – though of course he didn’t put it quite like that! See if this link works, or Google it –’s-envoy-daniel-taub-deploys-movies-and-high-tech-beat-boyc
    Note the title: “Israel’s envoy Daniel Taub deploys movies and high-tech to beat the boycott”. My impression is that there is an increasingly desperate effort to divert attention away from Israel-Palestine realities by any means available, with culture high on the list, alongside wild allegations of antisemitism.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s